Yesterday I told Dr Sampson that I would remove any further comments from her on here that were content-free trolling or a repeat of hysterical lies.
While I despise censorship, today she has posted more drivel and empty attacks on "anti-vaxxers", so I've removed a couple of her comments. Like her ideologically deranged peers, she answers questions with questions, and offers information which is either already obviously known by her target recipient, or more outright lies.
I want to give her a fair chance to defend herself against any claims of unprofessional behaviour, but I will not tolerate trolling BS.
I agree with you that the point of the Jikky thread was to show that, if you were to take Sampson's data as true, the dark explanation is contempt leading to maltreatment.
I suspect the less dark truth is that the claim (that vaccinated fared better cos ECMO data) was egregiously misreprented by Sampson to make a point that was false. That's still a serious crime but not as bad as it could be
The problem that then followed was that these people running the ECMO show have demonstrated complete and utter contempt for a fifth of the British public. The very minimum charge against them is that they publicly displayed it
Did it lead to selective maltreatment and deaths? Who knows, but the behaviour and contempt is directly prohibited in the GMC good practice guidelines. Perhaps these people should be subject to the same disciplinary action and suspensions they have so vocally called for against the "anti-vaxx crazy doctors" they hate so much.
When people have come to a conclusion without facts (false or true), it is almost impossible to get them to change their point of view with facts afterwards. Unfortunately I can't find the research that made this clear now.
A few only need to know the true story, the rest do herd behavior. Look at the blm riots, the rioters really hadn't thought about it: after all, it's for a good cause. Just like all those measures during the corona years.
The first months of 2020 I was also convinced that lockdowns were good and face masks worked. I hadn't researched anything about it myself, but it almost had to be. I had to read quite a bit before I was done. I'm quite critical myself, but I found out that I wasn't critical enough, in fact, I wasn't critical at all. I've only learned that in the past 2 years.
Unfortunately, we now live in a time when a lie is allowed for a good cause. Because of this, really bad people get away with it because they don't stand out from the crowd at all.
And if you even believe that the other person consciously threatens you because he or she does not want a vaccine, then of course everything is allowed.
Man is primarily an emotional being, the human nature lies in the fact that you deal with it wisely and that was / is hard to find in recent years.
If you want change, I think you have to start with the media. That determines the naritive. Just don't stop there. Because if you can change the msm for the better now, you can also change it for the worse in the future.
I think the only way out of this shitshow for now and in the future is for people to actually become real individualists. And no, that is not the same as the so-called egoistic society is now referred to. A true individualist is concerned with (as much as possible) independent thinking and is responsible for coming to a point of view. I think taking care of your environment will come naturally. This is because this is a logical consequence of it.
Not wanting to buy as big a boat as possible, that is not individualistic behaviour, that is herd behaviour. Wanting to belong to a (in this case) successful group.
Mr Sullivan, good sir. Apologies. I was a bit too incensed with the subject yesterday to render a comment to you.
This is great work. Excellent writing, analytics and well drawn questions. You and other good authors on various aspects of these difficult times appear to me to have the patience of saints.
1, How many of the patients had remdesivir before ECMO?
Did any of her patients survive?
People are classified unvaccinated until 21 days post jab.
The younger unvaccinated people might have been living with newly vaccinated parents or partners?
My son was vaccinated for work and I was helping him because he had a badly broken ankle and foot I spent quite a bit of time with him in those first 3 weeks and I got very sick and have not been the same since! Shedding is very real I think! I am not vaccinated but I bet my blood work would show something! My D-dimer was elevated but I can't get the doctor to test for anything that would confirm Shedding I guess!
Mostly I just want to know myself?
I have been taking something banned which is helping greatly doctor can't prescibe it!
People have cognitive dissonance and you can't change their mind on covid which is the biggest hoax!
PCR does not diagnose covid just that you are human!
> This ECMO-specific file shows that, for the period July-Nov 2021, approximately 92% of ECMO patients were indeed unvaccinated - a ratio of 11 unvaccinated patients for every 1 vaccinated. So (assuming the data is accurate) the unvaccinated were either genuinely sicker, as claimed by Dr Sampson, or were subjected to more cavalier treatment, as alleged by Jikkyleaks.
The problem is that data on any endpoint related to covid coming from hospitals is complete garbage. We know that vaccinated people were subjected to way less covid testing. All data filtered through the “tested positive for COVID” is utterly useless. Virtually any data involving COVID testing should have been and should continue to be ignored.
"Do Dr Sivananthan and Dr Sampson know each other?" Media isn't just there to act as spreaders of misinformation, they are there as gatekeepers - they keep everyone inside the rails of traditional research to make sure no one digs too deep. And sure enough, no one in the traditional or alternative media call the globalist propagandists on who and where they get their information from. It's usually assumed it comes from their own tiny, misinformed minds. But it's far too coordinated, to the degree of lockstep.
Case in point is Dr. Birx of the US Presidential Covid response team. It turns out that most of the worst policies came straight from her - and she even admits her role in manipulating the data and lying about the policies. And while Birx may be "book smart", just listening to her talk you can see she is obviously not a brilliant mind or even creative in her thinking. She admitted she didn't even look at the data herself, so how could she have developed an alternative narrative by herself? She didn't. She's a DoD insider, a useful authoritarian follower who doesn't question what she's been tasked to do. She was probably very heavily coached at least several times a week - what to say, what to do, what to write. She probably didn't even touch those reports that were due on Monday, I'm sure she was watching a movie while someone in the DoD was the ghostwriter.
One additional thing. Although I'm no expert in Marxism, I don't think that Marx would in any way sanction the globalist strategy being carried out. Calling it communism, Nazism, Maoism or even Stalinism doesn't accurately describe what's going on here, either. Never before in the history of mankind has a bid for power been based on destroying the world to 'save' it. There's something extra going on, far beyond any former attempt tor redesign how the world works and it needs a novel description, not a recycled one that doesn't apply.
I think it's incredible that you single out one person, when many medical professionals are speaking out. Are they all lying? Hoe are they benefitting? I think it's fantastic that he, and others like him are undermining the public's trust in big pharmaceutical medicine, when there is, and has, been many other less profitable options. You can't stop this avalanch of information. The tide is turning and the vaccine-injured WILL be heard.
Funny that caz was dead sure of 98%+ of patients in icu was unvaxxed and still the public and the rest of us are not allowed to know about patients status when vaxxed, ha ha. So, how do we know. I suppose when you don't like brocolli you don't like brocolli.
It's OK for the facts, but it still puzzles me your insistence about neo-marxism ideology taking over the entire ruling class. Perhaps I'm too blind but I don't see a inch of marxism anywhere in Britain, not even in the Labour Party. One can deduce that in your words globalism might be equivalent to marxism which is of course absurd and untrue. I can imagine that you will call Bill Gates a neo-marxist because he is the new Health-Czar of the world. It would be the same as calling atheist to the Pope. The only one ideology that is sweeping the world around is neoliberalism which is beeing abandoned all over right now in favour of mounting deep state intervention. If that's your idea of marxism, I suggest you revise all the basis of your thought. It has nothing at all to do with.
I agree with everything apart from your take on Neo Marxism.
I think it’s more than reasonable to say that those country’s you refer to as trying out Neo Marxism are in fact country’s that took over power under the umbrella of socialism and then NEVER handed over power to there people - thus giving rise to State Based Capitalism.
I did a quick search search for Neo marxism within wiki & it quotes Professor Richard Wolff as a keynote speaker at one of its events.
I’d encourage yourself & anyone interested in this type of pandemic correlation (and type of marxism) to look up Professor Wolff — Im confident you won’t find anything close to post industrial capitalism’s relationship with Big Pharma or Big insurance. You won’t find an ideology that even comesclose to being implemented like the stranglehold Roth Childs capitalism has had for the last 150 years.
What you will find regarding professor Wolff’s lectures is someone with one of the greatest knowledge bases of Marx’s critique of Le Capital in modern history. Wolff is a strong advocate for governmental power being handed to the people and to communities, with greater emphasis on working class structures such as worker co-op’s and closing wage gaps.
This plandemic has nothing to do with snotty nose left wing kids and EVERYTHING to do with feudalism’s successor - capitalism.
Call it crony, call it neo liberal, you can even call it fascist but it’s all capitalism & it all revolves around faith in humanity.
The 1 in 5 figure was taken from the delta period when sadly there were more pregnant and post partum women in ICU (& on ECMO) for severe Covid-19 as pregnancy is a risk factor for severe disease. This can be clearly seen from the ICNARC data. Admission for Covid-19 in England by vaccination status data was collected May21-Feb22 and is on p44-48 of the 8/4/22 report (demographic data on p48 - note how almost all of the pregnant/post partum women were unvaccinated at all the time of ICU admission & that this group comprises >1/3 of women aged 18-49y)
From this (NHSE supplementary information) if the excel link doesn’t work https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/supplementary-information/ (report titled 13 December 2021 –Adults admitted for Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Respiratory Failure following COVID infection – including pregnant/post-partum women and vaccination status)
The reason the majority of those in whom ECMO was started as a last ditch attempt to save life in severe lung failure from Covid-19 when all other conventional treatment had been exhausted is because vaccination protects against progression to such severe disease. ECMO is an advanced life support mode and can be life saving but it is only appropriate in certain people (those with critical lung failure refractory to conventional management who would be able to recover from severe a high acuity of illness and prolonged ICU/hospital stay - ie those with a good baseline health disease before getting critically ill - these are usually younger people - including pregnant women.)
Please review all these reports and then decide who is telling the truth with the data (that vaccination clearly protected against severe disease during delta - including in pregnancy especially the most critical Covid-19 disease requiring ecmo as the last ditch attempt to save life) and who is misrepresenting this data seemingly to try to suit a certain narrative and/or smear the person sharing it (& encouraging others to do the same)
Keen to read your response when you have reviewed these reports (all of which are available in the public domain), thank you
7th March 17:45 (UK)
Yesterday I told Dr Sampson that I would remove any further comments from her on here that were content-free trolling or a repeat of hysterical lies.
While I despise censorship, today she has posted more drivel and empty attacks on "anti-vaxxers", so I've removed a couple of her comments. Like her ideologically deranged peers, she answers questions with questions, and offers information which is either already obviously known by her target recipient, or more outright lies.
I want to give her a fair chance to defend herself against any claims of unprofessional behaviour, but I will not tolerate trolling BS.
This is great work. Well done.
I agree with you that the point of the Jikky thread was to show that, if you were to take Sampson's data as true, the dark explanation is contempt leading to maltreatment.
I suspect the less dark truth is that the claim (that vaccinated fared better cos ECMO data) was egregiously misreprented by Sampson to make a point that was false. That's still a serious crime but not as bad as it could be
The problem that then followed was that these people running the ECMO show have demonstrated complete and utter contempt for a fifth of the British public. The very minimum charge against them is that they publicly displayed it
Did it lead to selective maltreatment and deaths? Who knows, but the behaviour and contempt is directly prohibited in the GMC good practice guidelines. Perhaps these people should be subject to the same disciplinary action and suspensions they have so vocally called for against the "anti-vaxx crazy doctors" they hate so much.
Thanks John for writing.
When people have come to a conclusion without facts (false or true), it is almost impossible to get them to change their point of view with facts afterwards. Unfortunately I can't find the research that made this clear now.
A few only need to know the true story, the rest do herd behavior. Look at the blm riots, the rioters really hadn't thought about it: after all, it's for a good cause. Just like all those measures during the corona years.
The first months of 2020 I was also convinced that lockdowns were good and face masks worked. I hadn't researched anything about it myself, but it almost had to be. I had to read quite a bit before I was done. I'm quite critical myself, but I found out that I wasn't critical enough, in fact, I wasn't critical at all. I've only learned that in the past 2 years.
Unfortunately, we now live in a time when a lie is allowed for a good cause. Because of this, really bad people get away with it because they don't stand out from the crowd at all.
And if you even believe that the other person consciously threatens you because he or she does not want a vaccine, then of course everything is allowed.
Man is primarily an emotional being, the human nature lies in the fact that you deal with it wisely and that was / is hard to find in recent years.
If you want change, I think you have to start with the media. That determines the naritive. Just don't stop there. Because if you can change the msm for the better now, you can also change it for the worse in the future.
I think the only way out of this shitshow for now and in the future is for people to actually become real individualists. And no, that is not the same as the so-called egoistic society is now referred to. A true individualist is concerned with (as much as possible) independent thinking and is responsible for coming to a point of view. I think taking care of your environment will come naturally. This is because this is a logical consequence of it.
Not wanting to buy as big a boat as possible, that is not individualistic behaviour, that is herd behaviour. Wanting to belong to a (in this case) successful group.
Mr Sullivan, good sir. Apologies. I was a bit too incensed with the subject yesterday to render a comment to you.
This is great work. Excellent writing, analytics and well drawn questions. You and other good authors on various aspects of these difficult times appear to me to have the patience of saints.
Good evening and God bless good sir.
Great post. Keep it up.
"that the sane among us do fall into the trap"
You did mean 'do not' I'm guessing.
Follow the Money: US Doctors – 2022
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F557de202-0fde-4b8e-83a8-93e09532f402_825x822.jpeg
I have a few questions
1, How many of the patients had remdesivir before ECMO?
Did any of her patients survive?
People are classified unvaccinated until 21 days post jab.
The younger unvaccinated people might have been living with newly vaccinated parents or partners?
My son was vaccinated for work and I was helping him because he had a badly broken ankle and foot I spent quite a bit of time with him in those first 3 weeks and I got very sick and have not been the same since! Shedding is very real I think! I am not vaccinated but I bet my blood work would show something! My D-dimer was elevated but I can't get the doctor to test for anything that would confirm Shedding I guess!
Mostly I just want to know myself?
I have been taking something banned which is helping greatly doctor can't prescibe it!
People have cognitive dissonance and you can't change their mind on covid which is the biggest hoax!
PCR does not diagnose covid just that you are human!
They could have had influenza A or B
It's for DNA collection!
> This ECMO-specific file shows that, for the period July-Nov 2021, approximately 92% of ECMO patients were indeed unvaccinated - a ratio of 11 unvaccinated patients for every 1 vaccinated. So (assuming the data is accurate) the unvaccinated were either genuinely sicker, as claimed by Dr Sampson, or were subjected to more cavalier treatment, as alleged by Jikkyleaks.
The problem is that data on any endpoint related to covid coming from hospitals is complete garbage. We know that vaccinated people were subjected to way less covid testing. All data filtered through the “tested positive for COVID” is utterly useless. Virtually any data involving COVID testing should have been and should continue to be ignored.
Excellent points and research.
"Do Dr Sivananthan and Dr Sampson know each other?" Media isn't just there to act as spreaders of misinformation, they are there as gatekeepers - they keep everyone inside the rails of traditional research to make sure no one digs too deep. And sure enough, no one in the traditional or alternative media call the globalist propagandists on who and where they get their information from. It's usually assumed it comes from their own tiny, misinformed minds. But it's far too coordinated, to the degree of lockstep.
Case in point is Dr. Birx of the US Presidential Covid response team. It turns out that most of the worst policies came straight from her - and she even admits her role in manipulating the data and lying about the policies. And while Birx may be "book smart", just listening to her talk you can see she is obviously not a brilliant mind or even creative in her thinking. She admitted she didn't even look at the data herself, so how could she have developed an alternative narrative by herself? She didn't. She's a DoD insider, a useful authoritarian follower who doesn't question what she's been tasked to do. She was probably very heavily coached at least several times a week - what to say, what to do, what to write. She probably didn't even touch those reports that were due on Monday, I'm sure she was watching a movie while someone in the DoD was the ghostwriter.
One additional thing. Although I'm no expert in Marxism, I don't think that Marx would in any way sanction the globalist strategy being carried out. Calling it communism, Nazism, Maoism or even Stalinism doesn't accurately describe what's going on here, either. Never before in the history of mankind has a bid for power been based on destroying the world to 'save' it. There's something extra going on, far beyond any former attempt tor redesign how the world works and it needs a novel description, not a recycled one that doesn't apply.
I think it's incredible that you single out one person, when many medical professionals are speaking out. Are they all lying? Hoe are they benefitting? I think it's fantastic that he, and others like him are undermining the public's trust in big pharmaceutical medicine, when there is, and has, been many other less profitable options. You can't stop this avalanch of information. The tide is turning and the vaccine-injured WILL be heard.
Morals over Money.
Funny that caz was dead sure of 98%+ of patients in icu was unvaxxed and still the public and the rest of us are not allowed to know about patients status when vaxxed, ha ha. So, how do we know. I suppose when you don't like brocolli you don't like brocolli.
It's OK for the facts, but it still puzzles me your insistence about neo-marxism ideology taking over the entire ruling class. Perhaps I'm too blind but I don't see a inch of marxism anywhere in Britain, not even in the Labour Party. One can deduce that in your words globalism might be equivalent to marxism which is of course absurd and untrue. I can imagine that you will call Bill Gates a neo-marxist because he is the new Health-Czar of the world. It would be the same as calling atheist to the Pope. The only one ideology that is sweeping the world around is neoliberalism which is beeing abandoned all over right now in favour of mounting deep state intervention. If that's your idea of marxism, I suggest you revise all the basis of your thought. It has nothing at all to do with.
I agree with everything apart from your take on Neo Marxism.
I think it’s more than reasonable to say that those country’s you refer to as trying out Neo Marxism are in fact country’s that took over power under the umbrella of socialism and then NEVER handed over power to there people - thus giving rise to State Based Capitalism.
I did a quick search search for Neo marxism within wiki & it quotes Professor Richard Wolff as a keynote speaker at one of its events.
I’d encourage yourself & anyone interested in this type of pandemic correlation (and type of marxism) to look up Professor Wolff — Im confident you won’t find anything close to post industrial capitalism’s relationship with Big Pharma or Big insurance. You won’t find an ideology that even comesclose to being implemented like the stranglehold Roth Childs capitalism has had for the last 150 years.
What you will find regarding professor Wolff’s lectures is someone with one of the greatest knowledge bases of Marx’s critique of Le Capital in modern history. Wolff is a strong advocate for governmental power being handed to the people and to communities, with greater emphasis on working class structures such as worker co-op’s and closing wage gaps.
This plandemic has nothing to do with snotty nose left wing kids and EVERYTHING to do with feudalism’s successor - capitalism.
Call it crony, call it neo liberal, you can even call it fascist but it’s all capitalism & it all revolves around faith in humanity.
This is just my 2 cents, thanks for article.
There have thankfully only been 2 adult patients needing ECMO in England for severe Covid-19 during 2022. Please see p56 of the most recent UKHSA weekly national flu & covid19 surveillance reports https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1139827/Weekly_Flu_and_COVID-19_report_w9.pdf
The 1 in 5 figure was taken from the delta period when sadly there were more pregnant and post partum women in ICU (& on ECMO) for severe Covid-19 as pregnancy is a risk factor for severe disease. This can be clearly seen from the ICNARC data. Admission for Covid-19 in England by vaccination status data was collected May21-Feb22 and is on p44-48 of the 8/4/22 report (demographic data on p48 - note how almost all of the pregnant/post partum women were unvaccinated at all the time of ICU admission & that this group comprises >1/3 of women aged 18-49y)
I agree that the BBC article should have clarified this data was taken from the delta period in the latter half of 2021 rather than omicron variants period in 2022. I do not personally know the doctor quoted in that article https://www.icnarc.org/DataServices/Attachments/Download/d7890b82-5fb7-ec11-913d-00505601089b
For the England ECMO data covering 1/7/21-22/11/21 including vaccination & pregnancy/post partum status please see this report (96% of the pregnant/post partum patients needing ecmo were unvaccinated, which is not surprising considering how few vaccinated pregnant/post partum women were in ICU at all during that time) https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/12/Supplementary-Information-ECMO-251121-2.xlsx
From this (NHSE supplementary information) if the excel link doesn’t work https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/supplementary-information/ (report titled 13 December 2021 –Adults admitted for Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Respiratory Failure following COVID infection – including pregnant/post-partum women and vaccination status)
The reason the majority of those in whom ECMO was started as a last ditch attempt to save life in severe lung failure from Covid-19 when all other conventional treatment had been exhausted is because vaccination protects against progression to such severe disease. ECMO is an advanced life support mode and can be life saving but it is only appropriate in certain people (those with critical lung failure refractory to conventional management who would be able to recover from severe a high acuity of illness and prolonged ICU/hospital stay - ie those with a good baseline health disease before getting critically ill - these are usually younger people - including pregnant women.)
Please review all these reports and then decide who is telling the truth with the data (that vaccination clearly protected against severe disease during delta - including in pregnancy especially the most critical Covid-19 disease requiring ecmo as the last ditch attempt to save life) and who is misrepresenting this data seemingly to try to suit a certain narrative and/or smear the person sharing it (& encouraging others to do the same)
Keen to read your response when you have reviewed these reports (all of which are available in the public domain), thank you
The narrative writers can get away with lying and being retarded because NPC's are retarded.
"Far right..."
I hate BOTH "sides" equally.