The UK must withdraw from the ECHR
The ECHR and its associated joke of a "court" is a front for neo-Marxist globalists.
European court rules human rights violated by climate inaction - BBC News
The latest outrageous judgment from the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg, whose role is to “interpret” the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), has focused attention, yet again, on the anti-democratic, neo-Marxist institutions - both at home and overseas - who increasingly rule our world, ahead of elected politicians.
In essence the judgment, against the Swiss government, says that, in failing to take sufficiently robust action to tackle climate change, they have “violated the right to respect for private and family life” of the plaintiffs - a group of elderly Swiss women, represented by the British activist KC Jessica Seymour and funded by Greenpeace Switzerland.
The BBC - of course - reports the story in a completely uncritical way, and - of course - the totally unqualified Swedish activist Saint Greta makes the headline photo. While the sovereignty of the UK is undermined by a group of unelected European communist Malthusians, our “public service” broadcaster collaborates - once again - against the British people. They gleefully report that “the ruling is binding and can trickle down to influence the law in 46 countries in Europe including the UK”.
We have immediately seen outrage expressed at the judgment on social media, and the usual empty words from politicians about “mission creep”. Mission creep!? The ECtHR has invented international law, based on an invented “climate emergency”, to impose their insane totalitarian vision on the citizens of Europe. This is not mission creep, this is civil war, waged on ordinary people by delusional, unelected technocrats, who have zero accountability for their actions - and there is no possibility that it will end well.
Such a dystopian story of globalist over-reach would be horrifying even if there was a word of truth in the climate alarmist narrative of impending catastrophe. But the entire fiction has been manufactured by subversive factions precisely for the purpose of undermining Western society and ushering in global communism. Let’s have a quick look at the “catastrophic global warming” which has so egregiously “violated the right to respect for private and family life” for a group of gullible, deranged old biddies in Switzerland.
A peer reviewed paper published by the European Geosciences Union (EGU) - “the leading organisation for Earth, planetary and space science research in Europe” concluded that “summer 1540 was likely warmer than 2003”. Serendipitously for us, the paper specifically referenced Switzerland, explaining that proxy temperatures from the period (modern thermometers had not yet been invented) have been widely misinterpreted:
Prior to the “record breaking heat” in 2022, hysterically reported at the time by the BBC and others, 2003 was cited as a record breaking summer in Europe, and “proof” of man made climate change. Now, if the Summer of 1540 was as hot, or hotter, than recent summers, this creates two massive problems for today’s lunatics, who want to complete their neo-Marxist globalist coup under the guise of world-wide “pandemics”, unspecified “far-right” threats, DEI “inequities” and, last but by no means least, a “climate emergency”.
Firstly, 1540 was in a period of well below average temperatures in Europe, known as the “Little Ice Age” (LIA). If Summer 1540 matched or exceeded current “extremes”, what was it like during the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) a few hundred years earlier?
Of course, the usual suspects claim that the MWP and LIA were not “globally synchronous events". They don’t count when thinking about "man made climate change" (MMCC). Of course they don’t. From Wikipedia:
However, these are the same people who will tell you in the next breath that regional cooling and periods of extreme cold today are expected aspects of MMCC. This time from the UN:
Secondly, Europe in 1540 was unrecognisable from today’s advanced economic powerhouse. The population of Western Europe was ~57m in 1500, compared to ~420m in 2020. There were no concrete mega-cities in 1540, no motorways, no airports, no massive “Urban Heat Islands”, which have continued to expand inexorably to the present day. We would absolutely expect to find “record breaking temperatures” next to concrete runways in a huge megalopolis such as London or Paris, regardless of any fictitious global warming.
In addition to the Urban Heat Island effect, changes in forested areas, and increased use of water by larger, more affluent populations, affect localised climate without ever having to invoke ‘Greenhouse Gases’ and ‘Man Made Global Warming’.
There is no significant anthropogenic global climate change, affecting delusional Swiss pensioners or anyone else. The entire narrative is a deliberate scam, pushed by ideological crazies and taken advantage of by the usual opportunistic charlatans making billions from the “green economy”.
Ordinary citizens are being lied to - constantly and with increasingly brazen shamelessness. Contrary to the comforting platitudes regurgitated by so many social media influencers and alt-media talking heads, things are getting rapidly worse, not better. We are not “winning” and we now need to start demanding that our elected politicians begin to meaningfully act to reverse the madness.
The UK must immediately withdraw from the ECHR - and every single international quango, which have all been captured by “Long March” far left extremists. We must then repeal the Climate Change Act, disband the Climate Change Committee and much, much more.
We have a long road ahead of us if we are to save our country from these maniacs.
We can only hope that this tyrannical overreach by the unelected ECHR will somehow severely rebound on them.
I've been arguing against alleged man-made global warming for decades, to no effect. The entire narrative is such an obvious pack of lies, I naively assumed that our politicians would eventually see the error of their ways and that it would all fizzle out.
It is now clear that our treasonous politicians are working for their psychopathic, Malthusian globalist overlords rather than their own people. They showed their evil true colours through their Covid "plandemic". Their aim is clearly to destabilise and degrade our economies through deliberately-engineered energy and food shortages and to force the survivors into digital serfdom and technocratic one-world governance.
In all the decades I've been writing to our Uniparty politicians on this subject, giving them incontestible facts on why their climate change Net Zero endeavour is futile and pointless, especially when undertaken unilaterally, I've never, ever had a straight answer from any of them.
The first essential step to getting out of this mess is for people to stop voting for the Con/Lab/Lib/SNP Uniparty.
The ECHR is a front behind which 'they' can 'machinate' and promote the agenda, or, rather thrust it down people's throats. Just like with 'covid' there is a noticeable disconnect between how 'they' carry on their lives and how we are supposed to be making sacrifices to nudge the global thermostat downwards ( as if!). The gap we can see is, if not an Achilles Heel, a signal they speak with forked tongue, much like was revealed during Covid.
Jim Dale, a fixture on GB News, said 15th or16th March, the UK is to get "frightening hot summer In April as a result of climate change". What temperature is "frightening hot"....20c, 25c, 30c.....he wasn't asked.
The temperature in April 2007, for example, was up to the low to mid 20cs on a number of days. I wonder did he predict that with his climate crystal ball if he had it out then. It's not far off mid April with next week to be cooler than this week. Perhaps the prescient Mr Dale had a few actual days in mind for it to be "frightening hot" - we must wait and feel them if they arrive.
Sweeping statements sweep away actual facts .....they are made everyday about 'climate change/ emergency/ boiling/ crisping ( naturally)....they need to be constantly pinned down, drilled into.....and that's just the sweeping statements. The people making these 'sweeps' are exposing themselves as propagandists; many more people can 'sniff' them out after all the 'covid ' theatre of pronouncements via graphs and adverts.